Why MySQL Discourages UUIDs and Non‑Sequential IDs as Primary Keys: A Performance Analysis

MySQL officially recommends using auto_increment (sequential) primary keys instead of UUIDs or other non‑sequential identifiers. This article explores why UUIDs are discouraged by designing three tables— user_auto_key , user_uuid , and user_random_key —that differ only in their primary‑key generation strategy.

Using a controlled experiment, the author inserts identical data into each table via Spring Boot's JdbcTemplate and measures insertion time with StopWatch . The test environment includes springboot , jdbcTemplate , junit , and hutool for data generation.

The Java test code is shown below:

package com.wyq.mysqldemo;
import cn.hutool.core.collection.CollectionUtil;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyAuto;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyRandom;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyUUID;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.AutoKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.RandomKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.UUIDKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.util.JdbcTemplateService;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTest;
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch;
import java.util.List;
@SpringBootTest
class MysqlDemoApplicationTests {
    @Autowired
    private JdbcTemplateService jdbcTemplateService;
    @Autowired
    private AutoKeyTableService autoKeyTableService;
    @Autowired
    private UUIDKeyTableService uuidKeyTableService;
    @Autowired
    private RandomKeyTableService randomKeyTableService;
    @Test
    void testDBTime() {
        StopWatch stopwatch = new StopWatch("执行sql时间消耗");
        final String insertSql = "INSERT INTO user_key_auto(user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
        List
insertData = autoKeyTableService.getInsertData();
        stopwatch.start("自动生成key表任务开始");
        long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
            boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql, insertData, false);
            System.out.println(insertResult);
        }
        long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("auto key消耗的时间:" + (end1 - start1));
        stopwatch.stop();
        final String insertSql2 = "INSERT INTO user_uuid(id,user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
        List
insertData2 = uuidKeyTableService.getInsertData();
        stopwatch.start("UUID的key表任务开始");
        long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
        if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
            boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql2, insertData2, true);
            System.out.println(insertResult);
        }
        long over = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("UUID key消耗的时间:" + (over - begin));
        stopwatch.stop();
        final String insertSql3 = "INSERT INTO user_random_key(id,user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
        List
insertData3 = randomKeyTableService.getInsertData();
        stopwatch.start("随机的long值key表任务开始");
        Long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
            boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql3, insertData3, true);
            System.out.println(insertResult);
        }
        Long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("随机key任务消耗时间:" + (end - start));
        stopwatch.stop();
        String result = stopwatch.prettyPrint();
        System.out.println(result);
    }
}

The test results show that with around 1.3 million existing rows, inserting 100 k new rows, the auto‑increment key is fastest, the random Snowflake key is slower, and the UUID key is the slowest; the performance gap widens as data volume grows.

Further analysis compares the internal index structures. Auto‑increment keys produce sequential clustered index entries, minimizing page splits, reducing random I/O, and keeping pages densely packed. In contrast, UUIDs are random, causing InnoDB to perform frequent page splits, random disk reads, and increased fragmentation, which degrades insert performance.

The article also notes drawbacks of auto‑increment keys: they expose business growth patterns, can become a hotspot under high concurrency due to lock contention, and suffer from auto‑increment lock overhead. Tuning innodb_autoinc_lock_mode can mitigate some of these issues.

In conclusion, for most MySQL workloads, following the official recommendation to use sequential auto‑increment primary keys yields better insert performance and storage efficiency, while UUIDs should be used only when their global uniqueness outweighs the performance cost.