Overview of Global Acceleration Products and Deployment Scenarios
The article compares major cloud providers’ acceleration offerings—showing Tencent and Alibaba support acceleration channels, AWS and Google provide Anycast, and Google alone offers a global network—then outlines suitable business scenarios for each option and explains how each vendor exposes the client’s real IP at Layer 4 and Layer 7.
1. Global Acceleration Product Categories & Current Cloud Vendor Support
The following table summarizes the availability of acceleration channels, Anycast, and global network features for major cloud providers:
Accelerator Type
Cloud Vendor
Acceleration Channel
Anycast
Global Network
Tencent Cloud
√
√ (pending test)
×
Alibaba Cloud
√
√ (pending test)
×
AWS
×
√
×
Google Cloud
×
√
√
2. Business Scenarios and Generic Solutions
① Acceleration Channel
Cloud vendors: Tencent Cloud & Alibaba Cloud
Applicable scenario: Services with a unified gateway or external port for a small number of services.
Advantages:
Highly targeted acceleration for specific regions; can combine with AWS Route 53 for region‑based DNS resolution.
Disadvantages:
Multi‑region DNS changes are cumbersome.
Channel cost is relatively high.
Example game: "Zhicheng War Chronicle" using Tencent Cloud GAAP acceleration channel.
Architecture diagram:
② Anycast
Cloud vendors: AWS & Google Cloud
Applicable scenario: Services with a unified gateway or external port for a small number of services.
Advantages:
Simple configuration.
Relatively low cost.
Disadvantages:
Lacks targeting; depends on Anycast stability.
Architecture diagram:
Representative games: "Apocalypse Noise" (AWS) and "Ant Legion" (Google Cloud).
Architecture diagram:
Tip: Anycast IP load balancers limit ports, so they cannot handle all ports.
③ Global Network (Premium Network)
Cloud vendor: Google Cloud
Applicable scenario: Services without a gateway, where game servers are directly exposed to the internet.
Advantages:
No configuration required; directly reachable by global players.
Leverages the provider’s backbone network, offering strong DDoS resistance.
Disadvantages:
Reliant on Google’s backbone and POP node stability.
3. Obtaining the Client’s Real IP
The table below lists the protocols used by each cloud vendor at Layer 4 and Layer 7 to expose the client’s original IP address.
Cloud Vendor
Protocol
Tencent Cloud
Alibaba Cloud
AWS
Google Cloud
Layer 4
TOA module
Direct pass‑through (requires console configuration)
Direct pass‑through to EC2 origin (no extra setup)
1. go‑mmproxy 2. proxy‑protocol
Layer 7
X-Forwarded-For , includes the original client IP
X-Forwarded-For , includes the original client IP
X-Forwarded-For , includes the original client IP
X-Forwarded-For , includes the original client IP
Tips:
When the traffic flow is User → Global Acceleration → Layer 4 Load Balancer → Backend Application , the backend cannot obtain the client’s real IP.
When the flow is User → Global Acceleration → Layer 7 Load Balancer → Backend Application , the backend can retrieve the real source IP via the X‑Forwarded‑For header.
37 Interactive Technology Team
37 Interactive Technology Center
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.