How CES and NPS Reveal the Impact of a B2B Service Platform Redesign
This article details a two‑month quantitative study of the "CheShangTong" B2B app redesign, comparing pre‑ and post‑release surveys using Customer Effort Score, Net Promoter Score, and emotional experience metrics to evaluate service process, outcome, and user sentiment.
01 Indicator Design
To assess the upgrade of the B2B "CheShangTong" platform, three metric groups were chosen: Customer Effort Score (CES) to measure effort in the service process, Net Promoter Score (NPS) to gauge perceived value of the service outcome, and emotional experience dimensions (dependency, pleasure, trust) to capture users' affective response.
02 Questionnaire Design
The survey consisted of five parts: (1) screening questions to select eligible users and services, (2) CES questions asking participants to rate the difficulty of using the app on a 0‑10 scale (9‑10 = easy, 0‑6 = hard), (3) NPS questions asking the likelihood of recommending the app on a 0‑10 scale, (4) emotional experience items using a 5‑point Likert scale, and (5) demographic information.
03 Comparative Analysis
Post‑redesign results showed a modest increase in CES and a larger increase in NPS. Cross‑analysis revealed that both detractors and promoters improved their CES scores. Emotional scores (dependency, pleasure, trust) also rose, indicating stronger emotional ties to the app.
Sub‑service analysis highlighted improvements in most modules (home page functions, data, auction, publishing, personal center, customer communication) except for home‑page content, where personalization precision declined.
04 Summary
The study demonstrates that combining CES (effort) and NPS (recommendation) provides a comprehensive view of user experience and product friendliness. Ongoing research will explore additional metrics to capture multi‑dimensional user satisfaction.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
