Fundamentals 6 min read

Common Causes of C/C++ Core Dumps and Case Analyses

This article categorizes typical reasons why C/C++ programs generate core dumps, such as unreasonable program design, misuse of system libraries, memory leaks, type errors, thread ID handling, infinite loops, and improper initialization or cleanup, and provides illustrative case analyses for each scenario.

Baidu Intelligent Testing
Baidu Intelligent Testing
Baidu Intelligent Testing
Common Causes of C/C++ Core Dumps and Case Analyses

Introduction – Building on a previous article about core dump analysis, this piece presents several common categories of issues that cause C/C++ programs to crash and generate core dumps.

1. Unreasonable Program Design

Design flaws like memory leaks leading to OOM, incorrect handling of signed/unsigned types, improper casting of pthread_t , infinite loops, and poorly designed initialization/cleanup logic can all trigger core dumps. Each sub‑issue is illustrated with a concrete code example (shown as images in the original).

2. System Library Misuse

Incorrect use of standard library functions can also cause crashes: custom comparator functions for sort must return false for equal elements; printf should use a format string (e.g., printf("%s", str) ) to avoid format‑string vulnerabilities; unsafe string functions like strcpy can overflow buffers, and iterator invalidation when modifying containers during iteration (e.g., deleting elements from a vector ) leads to undefined behavior. Additionally, the select system call on Linux cannot handle file descriptors greater than 1023.

Conclusion – The article summarizes the collected cases, offers recommendations for safer C/C++ development, and promises future analyses of other problem types.

debuggingprogrammingCLinuxmemory-leakCore Dump
Baidu Intelligent Testing
Written by

Baidu Intelligent Testing

Welcome to follow.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

login Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.